Lesstep
Bitbucket Cloud and Data Center · Pull requests · October 26, 2026

Bitbucket code suggestions: how they are applied, and what goes wrong

In a comment on lines of a pull request, a reviewer can write the code those lines should become, and the author applies it with a button, as a new commit on the source branch. Bitbucket Cloud has had code suggestions since July 21, 2025 (BCLOUD-17360, 313 votes). Bitbucket Data Center has had them since Bitbucket Server 6.6, on one line at a time until 9.3.0 brought suggestions on several lines (BSERV-12219, 461 votes).

Suggesting and applying

Known problems

From Atlassian's public issue tracker, as of October 26, 2026:

Reading suggestions in IntelliJ IDEA

Pull Request Inbox for Bitbucket, a plugin by Lesstep for JetBrains IDEs 2024.1 or later, shows a pull request's comment threads in an IDE tool window and at their lines in the diff, from Bitbucket Cloud and, in beta, from Bitbucket Data Center 8.9 or later. From version 1.0.33, a ```suggestion block in a comment on lines says above it which lines it replaces, or that it deletes them when it is empty, and that Apply suggestion on the pull request page takes it; from 1.0.34 that includes suggestions on several lines on Data Center 9.3 and later. From 1.0.35, a comment written in its diff on several selected lines covers all of them on Data Center 9.3 and later (before, only the last one), so a suggestion written there replaces the whole range. The plugin does not apply suggestions itself. The review inbox, diffs, discussions and merge checks are free; approving, commenting and merging are Pro (US$1.50 a month, with a 30-day trial).

Get it on JetBrains Marketplace

Bitbucket and Atlassian are trademarks of Atlassian; IntelliJ IDEA is a trademark of JetBrains s.r.o. This page is not affiliated with or endorsed by Atlassian or JetBrains.

More: Rovo Dev code review · find every pull request waiting for your review · Bitbucket merge checks · pre-receive hook declined · Bitbucket pull request plugins for IntelliJ IDEA, compared · 日本語